I think darcy is correct.
It is worth noting that two bits of advice given to ASX appear now to have been worthless (unless a miracle happens).
On 4th August 2014 GCN advised that:
1. SIS had underwritten a placement of 75 million shares in GCN. This placement would raise $1.5 million.
2. For this $1.5 million placement, $1 million had "been unconditionally committed by a professional investor".
I doubt that ASIC has jurisdiction over a defaulting private investor. That would be a case for GCN to pursue. Why hasn't it?
On the other hand, SIS describes itself as an "Australian government licensed boutique investment banking company licensed under AFSL No. 246936." Surely a breach of an underwriting commitment by this sort of licensed company would be something for ASIC to investigate.
http://www.sino.com.au/docs/SIS_Corporate_Profile_Sep2013.pdf
Perhaps GCN could also sue SIS. I doubt that GCN will, though.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- GCN
- Have the GCN shareholders been misled ?
Have the GCN shareholders been misled ?, page-4
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 1 more message in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add GCN (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
EQN
EQUINOX RESOURCES LIMITED.
Zac Komur, MD & CEO
Zac Komur
MD & CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online