Sarco said: "if you are refererring to what i wrote, you are wrong. what you are doing is called projecting."
I was actually referring to what Club S wrote, when he differentiated 'instincts' from 'genetics'.
Why would I be projecting upon your good self when responding to a quote from Club S.
As for your post, you said:
"Instincts?...that is just parroting dribble...one side of the coin is just as childish as the other...which creates a futile diversion..."science" is another...a lot of our concepts that are summoned by words are stumbling blocks...
language is problematic...but behind the physical laws are non-physical ones - only a fool wouldn't "err on the side of caution...if you hit you hand with a hammer, is is reasonable to expect no bruise?"
First, you dismissed scientific investigation in favour of what seems to be some eclectic "non-conceptual" philosophy.
Second, you then imparted a defined concrete dogma of "behind the physical laws are non-physical ones". This is the same as "God"!
Third, you give a clear example of a physical law which requires no non-physical or mental input, that is, the inevitability of bruising when a hand is hit by a hammer.
To use your own words, I can only reply "only a fool" would post views that contradict each other and have no rational basis.
Best wishes
- Forums
- General
- hawking says creation godless
hawking says creation godless, page-106
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 12 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
1CG
ONE CLICK GROUP LIMITED
Mark Waller, MD
Mark Waller
MD
Previous Video
Next Video
SPONSORED BY The Market Online