Agree Stezza. It will be our customers in the end that do the...

Agree Stezza. It will be our customers in the end that do the marketing. It can almost be anything. If you do biogas with 100% renewables then it's carbon negative. If you do natural gas from fields with high CO2, and they have high methane leakage, then it clearly still has a significant footprint. But if you used that same source and displaced the SMR that was using it, then it's still a massive saving in emissions and a fantastic outcome.

Every jurisdiction has its own unique fiscal environment. And they each have their own current energy mix from which we can draw power, from 100% (think Norway or Tassie with hydro) to WA where you can't get 24 hr green power 365 days a year. And I wouldn't want Hazer to pay any premiums for power just for a demo.

So if a customer can put a carbon negative project together, that's great and they can sing it from the rooftops. But we don't need perfection to make a significant contribution, and the quickest and easiest contribution to emissions reduction and our bottom line will be via SMR displacement with natural gas. It's a great alignment! It's a huge opportunity. And our customers will know how to market this in their respective backyards to maximise incentives and gain public/govt support as necessary.