"In regards to RM's remuneration, most people agree that it is way to high for our small company to justify at present. I propose a motion that external independent professional advice be obtained to recommend a suitable range for his remuneration, and that the board be bound by that recommendation. I'm pretty happy with the 20 mil SSP -seems to be appropriate."
who will pay for external advice??
think about this...... if RM got paid less his current remuneration, by the end of the financial year it will probably end up the same once you include travel costs. doesn't he live in the SI? so if he lived in Aust and travelled back and forth AVQ would probably be square. sounds like a waste of time and pissing $$ up the wall imo
let the guy go ahead with the job, he got rid of external factors (SMM) lets not now distract him with internal factors...
no more posts/comments from me
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- Heads we win ...tails you lose!
"In regards to RM's remuneration, most people agree that it is...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 116 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add AVQ (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
I88
INFINI RESOURCES LIMITED
Charles Armstrong, CEO
Charles Armstrong
CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online