Let's assume that it is approved on the fast track, despite the fast track requiring some form of efficacy signal from surrogates or interims.
Why would any ethically sound doctor prescribe something that shows no efficacy? Why would an insurance company reimburse for it?
Heart Failure, page-3
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 58 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add MSB (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$1.13 |
Change
-0.025(2.17%) |
Mkt cap ! $1.284B | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $1.15 | $1.16 | $1.11 | $7.363M | 6.488M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | 94863 | $1.13 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $1.13 | 5000 | 2 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 26/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| MSB (ASX) Chart |