help(2), page-11

ccuyee1, I was addressing more this comment made by you:

"However, I am intrigued by the number of TIS share holders who still think that it was the fault of TIS or BIS at some point or the fault of some lazy public servants. Wise up people, streetwise I mean. No matter what TIS and or BIS had done, the result would have been the same"

That is false, BIS could have given CE Mark and this whole saga would be over, they had the power to do so. Now where your argument could come into play is "why" BIS didn't go through with their original classification, I have no doubt about the clout this treatment (VitroGro) would have to existing pharma standard of care and earnings.

So in short, YES I think it was BIS's fault and I disagree with you saying that TIS shareholders aren't "streetwise" for thinking this, my streetwise thoughts are in agreement with you that other forces could have been at play here, but to let BIS off of that list is nonsense in my view.