helps explain our delay issues, page-22

tototy, you confirm my understanding.

From memory their main argument was that no Detailed environmental study was done for the original application because it wasn't necessary at the time, although it would be now.

For the Court to make this retrospective on Lynas it would follow they would have to do the same for every other holder of the same license. Lot of petro-chemical companies in Malaysia and a lot of big international money.

The other issues were prepared by the WA greenies, discredited by Nick T and already knocked back in the recent appeal.

Hard to understand why the court has opened its doors to them but it shouldn't stop the statutory body issuing what's already approved.

As to the court action in Aust., can't wait to see what they've come up with. Great photo op for Adele to make an idiot of herself again.