here is conroy's email address , page-5

I have already written to him re his comments to NOT protect TLS shareholders. I mentioned in my correspondance that we don't need protection BUT also that we would not like comp given a free eg up at TLS shareholders expense either. I did also mention that there is about 1m TLS shareholders and more indirect via super funds. These people also have parents, other relatives and friends which all combined would add up very nicey too 3-4m voters, and how pollies love voters. I agree with DAF that any ann is just the beginning, the private part will not get funds, I think Conroy is still living in fantansy land.

and so it is.