I dont think some of you understand what our argument is here....

I dont think some of you understand what our argument is here. We are not saying 'let these people get cancer so we can get money'.

We are saying that Cougar has NOT been proven to have caused environmental harm.

They have actually proven that they have NOT caused any harm through extensive monitoring and reports.

Our argument, is that Cougar has been hung out to dry based on FICTION, Be it from the mouths of politicians or farmers. Its fine for people like this Bobby person to get on his high horse, but until you can actually argue that there is any wrongdoing or risk to health with a factual foundation for saying such, then we are STILL going to be pissed off that the little company we have invested in has been pooed on from such a height.

It is about fair treatment. Does everyone not deserve to have the accusations against them proven before they are sentenced?