So in summary they calcrete samples taken in October where taken manually at a deeper depth then the mechanical calcrete samples taken in December.
Id have a guess and say they will be going back and taking more calcrete samples by hand at the same depth as the December samples were taken.
Looks like the gold is deeper down then what the mechanical sampling method could go.
Good to see there's an explanation for the odd results we got and no doubt the company will be looking to rectify this in the near future.
Here we go, page-7
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 68 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
