here you go terrorism apologists, page-51

WT...I agree

Banjar's logic or approach is one of those seductions that are used and because it deals in the unsolvable and almost incromphensible issues that beset this debate.

But in the end its is exactly like the apologists for 9/11 that say "yes, terrible"..."yes, unacceptable"..."yes, utterly beyond the pale."

But, they go on

(there's that omnipresent BUT.....)

......the US brought it on itself...somehow.

Heres the tip.

Nothing justifies the 9/11 act and absolutely nothing justifies the bombing of the kids as we saw in Bagdad or the London bombings

No reasoning needed. No debate required. No interjections of grey accepted.

And that is what banjar just doesnt get.

For to do so is seductively asking you to debate the terrorist act and somehow find an explanation that attributes and appoprtions responsibility.

But as in all seductions....the definition says it all:
"lure or entice away from duty, principles, or proper conduct"

In this case...from common sense and decency