hi!, page-16

JoySav
I am not often on this thread these days, but to answer your question back on the 10/05, it was a rights issue back in 09 that I was referring to and perhaps you didn't get anything in the mail is beacause you were not a holder of BCC at that time. Springtree took up the remaining 69% that shareholders left. I am not bagging Dyesol only pointing to the fact that having Springtree involved is only going to benefit Springtree in the short term, if holders have an appetite for risk and are prepared to wait then good. I held Dyesol from early 2006 to late 2010 when I thought I would do better elsewhere for the time being. The recent shareprice is telling the story, I just am not prepared to keep my money unproductive for years.