"Hiatus" refuted. New analysis published in the journal "Science", page-5

  1. 15,810 Posts.
    Hey Pencil #

    This is what the all new NOAA revised data is based on.

    Possible artifacts of data biases in the recent global surface warming hiatus

    Abstract
    Much study has been devoted to the possible causes of an apparent decrease in the upward trend of global surface temperatures since 1998, a phenomenon that has been dubbed the global warming “hiatus.” Here, we present an updated global surface temperature analysis that reveals that global trends are higher than those reported by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, especially in recent decades, and that the central estimate for the rate of warming during the first 15 years of the 21st century is at least as great as the last half of the 20th century. These results do not support the notion of a “slowdown” in the increase of global surface temperature.

    These warmies who have carried out adjustments to all ocean data in the last 18 odd years.   They have excluded the ARGO bouy data.  They have adjusted again data from ships to use them for the ocean data.  They have recalibrated bouy data to that of the ships

    Seriously guys are we that dumb that collectively the whole world of experts were not able to realise that the ARGO bouy deployment was a complete waste of time and you guys have worked out that all the worlds bouys "should" have been calibrated to that of temperature readings from all of the worlds ships engine water inlets for the global ocean temps.

    This new data set is completely at odds with satellite data.

    Seriously guys,  dont you get it!!!!
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.