"Hiatus" refuted. New analysis published in the journal "Science", page-9

  1. 1,464 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 540
    Some feedback from another noted climatologist.  A good example of the variety of opinion on central issues.

    'Color me ‘unconvinced.’
    http://judithcurry.com/2015/06/04/has-noaa-busted-the-pause-in-global-warming/#more-18991

    In my opinion, the gold standard dataset for global ocean surface temperatures is the UK dataset, HadSST3.  A review of the uncertainties is given in this paper by John Kennedy http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/hadobs/hadsst3/uncertainty.html.  Note, the UK group has dealt with the same issues raised by the NOAA team.  I personally see no reason to the use the NOAA ERSST dataset, I do not see any evidence that the NOAA group has done anywhere near as careful a job as the UK group in processing the ocean temperatures.
    I am also unconvinced by NOAA’s gap filling in the Arctic, and in my opinion this introduces substantial error into their analysis.  I addressed the issue of gap filling in the Arctic in this recent publication:  Curry JA, 2014:  Climate science:  Uncertain temperature trends. Nature Geoscience, 7, 83-84.
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.