we know a lot of things escape you YAk
it is due to that narrow little hate filled bigotted mind of yours
saw a poll result recently where 70% of Australian think Hicks should be returned to Australia yep just a tiny minority
The only reason you see that Hicks did not break any Australian law is not relevant is that it further weakens any case against him. If he had broken an Australian law you would be screaming that this is further justification to hold him without chrges or a trial for 5 years. You are so transparent Yak
I for one though was not in favour of Hicks being returned to Australia. I fhe had truely commited offences then he should have been charged and then tried in a fair an open manner
simple end of story and all your twisting and squirming around the issue can not change that fact
But now that the US has held hicks for 5 years and the most they have been able to do is come up with some vague non-descipt charges against him that they were not even able to provided his defence lawyer the details of and a rigged kangaroo count that would have gauranteed a guilty verdict both of which have been knocked out by the US supreme court - there is a strong arguement that enough is enough and Hicks should be released
as I have said about you before yak it amazes me that you fully support US troops invading another country and being killed on the pretense (what a joke) of bring freedom and democracy to that country Yet you are so keen to see one of the central principals of freedom and democracy - the right to a fair trial undermined in the US.
- Forums
- General
- hicks:another travesty of justice
hicks:another travesty of justice, page-24
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 85 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
I88
INFINI RESOURCES LIMITED
Charles Armstrong, CEO & MD
Charles Armstrong
CEO & MD
Previous Video
Next Video
SPONSORED BY The Market Online