diet...no problems with the GConvention and how we deal with combatants
But the GC is designed for armies to deal with armies. An army of a state, in a uniform, under arms and sanctioned by a legitamate state.
Terrorists are none of the above and hence arent afforded either the dignity or the the comfort of protection under same.
And why should they???
They dont abide by any of the accords and yet they want a reciprocity??
Nah....
Places like the G were designed to deal with them
Personaly a well placed nato round would be a far better solution
- Forums
- Political Debate
- hicks guilty until proven innocent
hicks guilty until proven innocent, page-18
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 15 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)