I agree there seems an issue with the strength of hard evidence in regards to the alledged rape and ill treatment in the workplace.
Someone here raised the issue of the bruise photo. I dug back and am left thinking the photo itself offers nothing in terms of evidence.
From what I could see reading old news reports, when interviewed by the AFP in the initial meetings there was no mention of an injury of any type and also no AFP notes of being woken up due to a pressure on her leg.
The photo itself first appeared in 2021 for the project and had no time stamp.
I didn't see any mention of those AFP meetings corroborating the 'I was crying and said no at least 6(?) times.
The security guard said she didn't look in distress or saw signs of crying.
All interesting from the context of reading news reports .. especially given there is a very real problem with news outlets being selective with their narrative reporting.
- Forums
- Political Debate
- Higgins vs Lihrmann
Higgins vs Lihrmann, page-1174
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 1,261 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
LPM
LITHIUM PLUS MINERALS LTD.
Simon Kidston, Non--Executive Director
Simon Kidston
Non--Executive Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online