As much as BL appears to be a sleazoid, circumstantial, unrelated evidence normally (unlike what some LWNJ's wish), has no bearing on an individual case.
The other charges as I understand it have been filed subsequent to the BH allegations, have only been initiated since the case has has national coverage and the woman believes Brucey is 'the one' and the complainant has only just filed, because of becoming aware that (he was the same)? person with which they had (an evening)? The complainant has taken years and only now to make the claim- which does diminish its veracity in this circumstance at face value. Similarly, no consideration can rightfully be given to this subsequent matter against the original case.
