Good comment.
Note that I used 1.5% Pb+Zn cut-off, not 1.5% ZnEq cut-off. You're going to see a larger mineralized envelope if using 1.5% ZnEq cut-off, which is what the company is using, internally.
Cu/Ag/Au were not assayed in most of the historic holes, but Cu and Au/Ag are strongly correlated to Pb+Zn so the sections I posted should serve as a good guide.
Good comment. Note that I used 1.5% Pb+Zn cut-off, not 1.5% ZnEq...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 54 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
