This part of the AFR piece, if true, is quite meddlesome:
"The claim appears to relate to a period before Mr Cottee was CEO of Central Petroleum," the spokesman said. But John Heugh, who was in charge of Central when the original agreement was signed with GRR, said he believed GRR had "an excellent case" against Central, assuming the existence of an agreement with Mr Shortt. "Naraj was pivotal in the introduction of Total and in the early discussions with Total," Mr Heugh said.
Mr Heugh says that he believes that GRR has an excellent case" against Central "assuming the existence of an agreement". If he does not know whether there is or is not an agreement how can he possibly formulate a judgement as to an "excellent case". That contribution appears to me to be an uninformed intervention.
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
