But we have people saying they're incorrect from two examples taken from the extreme end of the level of warming homogenisation. And then others in turn jumping to all sorts of conclusions about the whole dataset, and the BOM's motives or agenda.
I agree the BOM should pull the finger out and properly justify their actions, or at least make them totally transparent so they can be put under the microscope by the appropriate scientists.
But I am suspicious of the motives of those attempting to impeach the BOMs good name from cherry picked data and examples. Just as any sceptic should.
