A meaningful strategic acquisition may be impossible without entering into the debt cycle. The amount of money required to purchase an asset that would make IPR a going concern and return an annual profit, would cost far more than IPR have.
Remember: 30-35 million
Liability estimates:
Less tax possibly $10 million - less if all money is re-invested Less contingent loss $5 mill plus Less accrued interest on contingent loss, possibly $1 mil + Less recent secret capital commitment $ unknown Less payout for executive contracts in 2009 $unknown Less loss on double shuffles to Offspring $ unknown Less the atrocious burn rate approx $4 mil Less payments to partners $ unknown Less dilution factor and sentiment dump from the next round of performance bonus options to our magnificent management Less 50% of the leftovers as a return to shareholders and we have a share price of 4 cents or less, not 70 cents or any other insane prediction.
Initiating a strategic review says there is little or no more money coming? Even if they win a few more cases, there is no profit! IPR is living proof that IP assertion does not pay a commercial return on an investment to its shareholders?
We need an accurate assessment of whatsleft and a list options shareholders can put to the company before they burn the lot? Thats if anyone really gives a hoot anymore?
IPR Price at posting:
0.0¢ Sentiment: None Disclosure: Held