The problem with deliberately obscuring the truth is that it can be so easily found out on a public message board. Not that it's any of your business anyways- users get suspended then reactivated again all the time. But if you'd bothered to copy and paste the whole thing, rather than just selectively picking things you like, you'd see:
04/02/11 10:32 Activation smartinvestor234 Status Updated - Active Private: Account reactivated, suspended by mistake. Please take care with choice of words. Public: Account reactivated.
03/02/11 17:55 Suspension smartinvestor234 Status Updated - Suspended Private: "Good luck, I'm behind 7 proxies. :p" Use of proxies to try and hide ID is not permitted. Public: Use of proxies to try and hide ID is not permitted.
Admittedly you couldn't have seen the 'private' part of the message, but the fact that this so-called 'suspension' expired less than 24 hours after issue should have given you a clear indication that it was a mistake.
That wouldn't suit the MO though, would it? It's far easier to try and attack the poster rather than the post. Labelling such rubbish as 'research' as well gives a clear indicator as to why one of us makes money out of RRS and the other one holds blindly and makes nothing.
RRS Price at posting:
12.0¢ Sentiment: None Disclosure: Not Held