A very solid/smart plan KC.Can't fault your rationale.Anything I...

A very solid/smart plan KC.Can't fault your rationale.
Anything I say on HC is only my view and others can take something from it or put in the wastebin at their choice.
I guess my "strapped in" approach is a product of becoming aware of the potential of the tenement just after it was acquired 3 yrs + ago and following the story , with its ups and downs (including GFC 1 ),over the intervening period.
More recently , as the SBR story has been revealed in wider forums , such as Indaba/ Toronto/London , a growing band in the industry appear to have heard and embraced the potential ....presumably after listening to the trail of geological pointers that we have.
For example , my understanding is that the London presentation was an invitation that resulted from someone (presumably knowledgable and influential) who was highly impressed when exposed to the SBR story and considered it exciting enough to warrant exposure to the big boys in London.
I also understand that the the BBY analyst who produced the recent report did so after visiting the tenement following Indaba.

So ,the "rose coloured glasses" that I reflect on HC are a product of my own research and an interest in giving the story some exposure on this forum for readers to do their research and make an informed choice as to whether to follow the SBR story , or not.
I am pleased ,thus far,that those in the industry that have been exposed to the story appear to have embraced the potential of SBR reinforcing my personal opinion.
But , there is no question that at the end of the day that the geologists , geophysicists and industry analysts could all be wrong ...but how else can you form a view ?
May you have every success ..and I look forward to the day that your Diclosure indicator changes to Stock Held!!!
I suspect I will be in a very good mood myself.
Best wishes
Q