No, that is just your insecurity.I can assure you that I have no...

No, that is just your insecurity.

I can assure you that I have no insecurity in the competitive landscape. This "vast" landscape which you are trying to prove provides no specific details or comparison charts that provide an accurate representation of the comparison.

I think you meant to say the number of processors that would be used in total (not in each vehicle) would be X * Y

Good catch. Yes, that statement was a mistake and should have read, "The total number of processors that will be used". 'Y' is the variable that represents the number of processors per vehicle.

Regardless, the important point is what is the probability that Y ends up being 0?

I think it's funny that you would even ask that. Given that Mercedes has already announced its use in a production-ready sub-component of the vehicle itself, I would say that the probability is 0% of 'Y' being 0 as we know it must be at least one.

However, a cheer for your correction and the feeble attempt at trying to make it seem as if the Mercedes announcement had no significance towards the future sales of Brainchip's Akida.