I don’t agree totally with the personal responsibility part!
Moderator’s are busy people and it appears they mainly rely on posters selecting the category of moderation after a poster has being dobbed in!
I don’t think they have time to double check the source and it easier to rubber stamp the whinging poster assessment.
Disgruntled posters who have aims to prevent a certain poster submitting further posts, can gang up on a particular issue, generally usually look for subtle disguised profanity as example, to get a poster suspended.
The number of moderation is the main deterrent not the validity of the content!
Have much profanity have u came across and in many cases these poster haven’t been moderated.
A lot of profanity goes on, on HC!
I rarely use disguised profanity and generally they’re terms that doesn’t cause offence too people.
This allow certain posters to gang up on a touchy thread to curb free speech!
Especially newer info coming out about past group of people etc.
U know my favourite topics and it appears more academics are showing interest since about 2015 in this poorly researched period.
- Forums
- Political Debate
- Hotcopper on the anti free speach bandwagon
Hotcopper on the anti free speach bandwagon, page-34
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 77 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
LGP
LITTLE GREEN PHARMA LTD
Paul Long, Chief Executive Officer
Paul Long
Chief Executive Officer
SPONSORED BY The Market Online