If I was a holder I'd take PLS scrip and rollover relief and enjoy exposure to the sector's leading independent producer. You stay leveraged to lithium prices and a recovery in the cycle without the financing and development risk that LRS standalone has. Risk and return; less risk for lower return volatility but still upside leveraged. Standlone LRS is high risk high return but in this price cycle has little chance of raising the debt and equity needed to build the project. I'd vote YES.
How about we just vote NO!, page-32
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 8 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add LRS (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
18.5¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $518.2M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 18.0¢ | 18.8¢ | 18.0¢ | $1.230M | 6.659M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 27 | 3208042 | 18.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 18.5¢ | 4120 | 2 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 18/10/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| LRS (ASX) Chart |