I agree. Its been discussed ad nauseam, our royalty arrangement are in line with industry standards. People that keep ignoring this fact are either thick or just thick. If there are sub-optimal aspects (e.g. timing of royalty receipts, how they are applied to non-applicator sales, and so on) these are being addressed in new arrangements e.g. second technology. We just need P&G to sell more applicators - expand territories, products, etc. They seem to be doing this slowly but surely. Generally speaking, peak sales of a product doesnt usually occur in Year 1 or 2, it normally takes a bit longer than that. The utility and market reception of the applicator suggests this is going beyond limited gimicky marketing campaigns (and yes, P&G might change their mind at any moment but that applies to every product in their portfolio - its performance-based). Who here thinks the applicators have not been a stunning marketing success......
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- WFL
- how did you find Obj?
how did you find Obj?, page-21
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 9 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add WFL (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
0.3¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $1.478M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Featured News
WFL (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable