Have you read the Glaucus report? I would not give credit to...

Have you read the Glaucus report? I would not give credit to claims made by an organisation such as Glaucus, whose sole purpose is to destroy market value so it can profit. Glaucus has no qualms about misleading the market and panicking investors - indeed that is what it is in the business of doing.

But I do read and take note of the AFR. And I expect the AFR to provide balanced insight, and be the unemotional/unbiased voice that helps myself and other investors more clearly assess what is actually going on. The AFR seems to have been doing this in the article link I posted in the previous post. The AFR points out:

"It is now clear that if Glaucus did have a financial services licence [in Australia] it would be in hot water with the securities regulator for apparently misleading the market about Blue Sky.

Glaucus, however, has probably achieved what it set out to do because no matter what Blue Sky says, some mud will stick. "


Some of the claims made by Glaucus may prove to be true. So might the claims made by Joe Aston. But instead of Joe Aston's snide histrionics, that only serve to further destroy market value, instil panic and confusion, and harm investors, I would like to see more of the balanced commentary that the AFR is known for.

I post the AFR article again:  

http://www.copyright link/brand/cha...k-with-list-of-glaucus-errors-20180403-h0yagk