Here's my rough-n-ready (simplistic) attempt at comparing BLR's Taylor Ranch/Picnic Tree Project to the Valhalla/Skal Project in Queensland, based on the JORC compliant indicated and inferred resources so far proved up.
At a cutoff of 0.025% U308, Taylor Ranch/Picnic Tree contains 24.4 Mlb of U308, which is owned 100% by BLR. Grades are typically 0.054% U308.
At a cutoff of 0.023% U308, Valhalla/Skal contains 57.0 Mlb of U308. SMM's share of this is 28.5 Mlb (50%). Grades are typically 0.08% U308. Mining of uranium is currently prohibited in Queensland.
As at market close yesterday, SMM's market cap. was $629m for a share price of $3.05, while BLR's was $99m for a share price of $0.16.
Calculate then a target price for BLR of $0.16(629/99)(24.4/28.5) = $0.87
The above is simplistic (ignores any share dilution, differences in capex, etc), but it does suggest that BLR's share price should be much higher than today's post announcement price.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- how does it compare
Here's my rough-n-ready (simplistic) attempt at comparing BLR's...
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 1 more message in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add BLR (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
LPM
LITHIUM PLUS MINERALS LTD.
Simon Kidston, Non--Executive Director
Simon Kidston
Non--Executive Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online