Drugs must demonstrate clinical significance. For example, if...

  1. 2,237 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 544


    Drugs must demonstrate clinical significance. For example, if there is statistical proof of a 1-letter gain, that likely won’t be enough for approval. So, the "2nd prize " hypothetically speaking we might recover half our OPT investment (zero for options, could come if the overall gain is less than 3 letters, but IMHO only if a specific subgroup (PCV?) achieves 4 or more letters, meeting the threshold for clinical significance. I don’t think there’s a "3rd prize."

    Obviously, I don’t want to sound too negative - maybe just a bit too much nervous waiting. That said, I believe with 80–85% certainty that we’ll see a gain of 3 or more letters ( US$2.5B/year) and around a 50/50 chance of hitting 5+ letters (US$4.1B/year?). That’s why I’m invested.

    https://hotcopper.com.au/data/attachments/6834/6834931-daf8a794fcb4b1fee4b9c0989594578f.jpg

    Last edited by FreeFromStyle: 25/02/25
 
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.