Agree with what you said, I was actually hoping someone would...

Agree with what you said, I was actually hoping someone would provide that graphic (I didn’t want to have to dig it up myself) as it shows just how desperate patients are for even the slightest gain in vision. 24% of doctors willing to use it even if it’s LESS than 3 letters. That’s pretty impressive, it’s more than half the number of doctors willing to use it for a spectacular result showing that the main goal really is even the slightest improvement in vision (that’s how important it is). Doesn’t really matter what it is, as long as it’s an improvement they’ll take it over vision loss (though we’re obviously hoping they hit the ball out of the park)

When you consider the fact that just 1% of this market is worth $100m (presumably USD), 24% of doctors willing to use it even if it achieves an arguably bad result (compared to P2) is pretty reassuring