Ok lets clear some stuff up,
Giddy Up recently posted this: (GY italics $$$$ non-italics)
"Did you really call me an idiot? Wow. I liar and now an ioiot you say. Have you read any of your own posts? If you claim that you didn't say it then let review what you have posted since you joined us here on 4/10/2023:"
Yep sure did. You are lying again the first post of mine that I can find was 15/7/22,
I have told you that before it just doesn't sink in.
"On 27/7/2023 you falsely speculated that it was MM who invented BIT225 and Biotron's IP instead of the now deceased Prof Peter Gage and his team. That wasn't the only time you tried pushing that false story was it? Even after you were told on multiple occasions that this wasn't true you did it again."
What I actually said was:
"I think MM is doing a great job,
And has the experience and skillset required,
Having worked for over 25 years in the bioscience industry.
She may well be the Inventor of much of the IP BIT uses and needs....
I think it is very un-wise for people to suggest she be replaced,
And really think that if She were a Male CEO that it would likely not be happening as much.
To me MM is a Substantial part of the core of BIT,
And She knows her stuff.
Good things take time,
And it's better to take the time to get it right the first time,
Especially in this space.
They all contribute and together make Biotron.
Everyone adds something to the Co."
That's not what GY falsely stated is it?
Lying again?
See in no way do I mention Michelle being the Inventor of BIT 225,
BUT I do think they and the entire team have created a lot of IP
Since 2005 after Peter Gages unfortunate passing,
Such as Patents, Papers, Trials, Published articles, Dosing, Testing on Covid, Etc.
"On 29/9/2023 you told the entire world your theory about how Biotron was worth $1.2 trillion. Do you remember that one? You are the worst ramper ever"
Here's my actual quote:
"What would be a fair Valuation for BIT?
Given that it could take over,
$260+ Billion Dollar per year markets,
for Big Pharma?
Well looking at CSL,
CSL MC $121 Billion
It had $13.3Billion in Revenue,
And $2.2 Billion Profit
So if BIT were to get just 5%,
of the $260 Billion a Year,
Covid and HIV markets,
It should exceed those numbers.
A Valuation of $120 Billion seems reasonable.
If it took 50% of the market,
$1.2 Trillion seems logical...."
So What I did was comparison with a Peer ASX Listed Company,
And explained that BIT only needs a very small percentage of the markets it is effective in,
To meet or exceed CSL's profit therefore likely giving it a similar valuation,
Then showed using the same profit to MC ratio the value of more market share.
On 30/9/2023 you said "$1 or more Before news sounds perfectly reasonable". That was BS wasn't it? What is the SP?
Yep I did say that, IMU has been $3Billion MC and is in Phase II,
So I do think it would be reasonable for BIT to hit $1 which is about $1Billion MC in Phase II.
On 2/10/2023 You said "Really it should go far higher than the 48 cents it reached in 2018". Wrong
On 3/10/2023 "BIT should go multiples of the 46 cents it hit in 2018". Oh, wrong again but getting closer !
On 4/10/2023 "When it hit 43 cents on the 20/10/18". Really, on a Saturday ! Wong price, wrong date again.
5/10/2023: "BIT went on to hit 48 cents on the 20/10/18. 25 bagging in 23 Days !!!!". Okay, back to that again despite being told that it was wrong 20 times. Do you just make up random prices and dates?
Yep I made some Typo's 100% my own fault,
Wrote it down and typed it in wrong.
I corrected it and apologised.
5/10/2023 You said to another poster: "Oh no, It's another newby know it all.... ". You first posted in BIT treads on 4/10/2023 ! Who were you calling a newby?
Wrong again,
I have been posting on here since at least 15/7/22,
I have explained it to you,
But you choose to make false statements instead of correcting yourself and apologising.
5/10/2023: To another poster: "Well you have proven yourself wrong twice on that one". Mummy hasn't explained irony to you has she?
Well it does seem amusing that you keep getting the date I joined wrong,
As well as what I stated about the IP,
Yet continue to knit-pick others.
You were also either wrong for years downramping or are wrong now, which one is it?
7/10/2023: "Not only that it has the stats and numbers, that are usually only seen in Phase III Trials."..... this is not unlicensed medical advice but WRONG.
Well this is some info on Phase III Trials
"Researchers design Phase 3 studies to demonstrate whether or not a product offers a treatment benefit to a specific population. Sometimes known as pivotal studies, these studies involve 300 to 3,000 participants."
BIT has had around those numbers,
Well over 200 people have trialed BIT 225,
Studies also include those who take a placebo.
So Yes I do think they are the sort of numbers seen in Phase III
7/10/2023: "Hundreds of people have tried BIT 225, With excellent results and without side effects." .... Really, hundreds treated "without side effects" you reckon? Have you read the results from even a single trial?
Yep, 100's have trialed BIT with no significant side effects,
Michelle mentions over 200 in the VID I posted recently,
And that's before these recent Phase II Human Trials,
That we are awaiting results on.
And Yes I have read all of the Trial Data that I have been able to find.
9/10/2023: "These low-lifes are trying to ride our coat-tails, And take advantage our research and skill, because they do not have any." LOL, yeah we have seen your research. You started posting here 4/10/2023. Your coat-tails LOL !!!
That is the 3rd time you have got that wrong in just this one Post !!!!
I have been posting on here since 15/7/22,
I have explained that to you multiple times,
Yet you keep posting it incorrectly.
How hard it is to look it up and get it right?
Anyway I can happily address them all,
But there's a few false statements that have been corrected now....
"
