Why are we putting up with his attitude ? He and the rest of the board are supposed to work in the
best interests of shareholders big or small, long suffering or recent. Not in the interest of themselves.
Its that simple. Its actually really bloody simple with regards to insider trading and non disclosure too. If they knew about material things and they did not disclose them or if they or others bought or sold or bought because they knew things others didn't they have broken the law and that will eventually catch up with them no matter what part of the planet they are in. Why not appoint an experienced independent non executive Australian director that all the shareholders are happy with, Why not ?
Why are we putting up with his attitude ? He and the rest of the...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 467 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
