You, some time back provided VERY questionable said CC evidence...

  1. 23,066 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 1
    You, some time back provided VERY questionable said CC evidence of what they were teaching, which went back to around the 100's and maybe just a pinch earlier = Evidence number one.

    Evidence and truth number two -> What Jesus taught, the Apostles etc, the Bible, does NOT in anyway match what you lot claim, on the key core basics of who and what the Father and Son are.

    = Case closed, done and dusted.

    That is the VERY reason you lot insist on and HAVE TO = No Bible alone, because you know it swallows you up in a flash.
    Hence many passages you lot do draw on, you have to get creative and inventive with them, ignoring their clear and intended meaning.
    Hence you at times do a sermon on a passage, to try and fool the sheep, to make the creation stick, and yet many of your points, fall head over heels.

    Your total abomination of the likes of John 17:3 and more, is very telling.
    There is NO WAY that you can deny with truth, that Jesus didn't independently of himself, define the Father as the Only True God when he was here.
    Now don't get deluded again with this crazy notion of the eternal life aspect here, as that is Not the point here, OR whether they work in unity etc.

    Jesus pitting himself against the Father if we stand by this truth, is nothing but absolute nonsense and pure desperation, effectively panic mode.
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.