Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

I think your statement speaks for itself and needs no commentary...

First 580 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
szaba_the_hut

13,429 Posts.

688

17/07/18

09:08

Post #: 34383246
Share

Originally posted by mjp2 ↑

"Low sensitivity equals weak climate forcing, high sensitivity equals strong climate forcing."

There's the error right there. That's not the case.

Low sensitivity indicates a weak response and lower equilibrium change in response to a forcing, warming or cooling.

But first you have to determine if the net forcing is warming or cooling.

Which is exactly what those papers did (and their predecessors) in assessing we aren't going into an ice age for the next 100,000 years, or more.

Expand

I think your statement speaks for itself and needs no commentary from me.
Upvote

Reply

There are more pages in this discussion • 23 more messages in this thread...

First 580 Last