Valueless, a little research into the link between atmospheric CO2 and surface temperatures might have saved your post, but as it stands its incorrect and a waste of space.
do people put out incorrect information and hope no one will notice, or do they just want to muddy the waters and 'fill the space with shit.'
either way, it's propaganda pseudoscience, and the stuff deniers buy hook, line and sinker, because the only role of deniers is to deny.
if you can log the following from 'A Climate Primer' published by Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) you'll be so far ahead of the denier rabble, you'll start losing friends.
- Forums
- Science & Medicine
- how stupid can denial get?
how stupid can denial get?, page-661
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 1 more message in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
BOE
Uranium prices on the NYMEX are stable, but ASX uranium stocks are sinking on Friday. The answer lies in Kazakhstan
DVP
Commodity house Trafigura funds Develop Global's copper-zinc Woodlawn play with offtake deal in place