It's been a long time since I've posted on HC. I thought the...

It's been a long time since I've posted on HC. I thought the ramping was bad back then but it's increased ten fold. It's ridiculous, such unwarranted speculation going both ways. Ramping up a stock creates unrealistic expectations and when those expectations are not (inevitably) met then people run for the hillls. I can't count how many people have talked up this stock as being bigger than SYR. Well, looking at SYR grades they've intersected 196m at 16.9% graphite & 0.41% V2O5, 72m @ 22% & 0.48%, 79m @ 20.4% & 0.42% and 119m @ 14.7% & 0.48%.
We all know TON's grades by now - 80m @ 10.3%, 76m @ 9%, 24m @ 13.2%, 12m @ 12.6%. V2O5 results are all 2m intersections at 0.36, 0.32 & 0.31% respectively.
It's clear there is a big difference between the results here. SYR have been spectacular, TON have not been in their league. So from early indications it doesn't seem that there is any similarity with TON lagging a significant way behind SYR in both grades and more importantly the length of the intervals where the disparity is huge. Bigger than SYR? Now THAT'S some kind of upramping...........