howard and costello go to bat for david hicks, page-16

cerhob "If Hicks is so innocent why doesn't he let the case proceed and let the evidence be subjected to international security. If the evidence is tainted let them put the tribunal on show."

It wasn't that long ago when the US Supreme Court rule against these hasty set-up military tribunals that don't have to follow the rules of evidence. You think the US lawyers are going to trust this process, a reshaped railroading process?

cerhob "Military tribunals are not newly invented."

So why was the current military tribunal reshaped after the US Supreme Court ruled it (kangaroo court) illegal?