I suspect if the Vugularity was caused by exposure of an ancient reef then it probably won't be small . ever heard of only a small part of a reef being exposed?
Looks like the NW section of the reef was exposed but the SE section near Blina was not. This kinda makes sense as apparently there were 2 reef trends, Blina and Harold that opened to a tranquil devonian sea to the SE .. closer to the sea, the deeper it was ?????????
But we cannot tell the size or hydro charge until it can be tested, so just p10 speculation ATM .. or should that be P01?
Anywho, I still prefer the Backreef prospect because it's closer to a known oil source (at blina) and the the solid reef would act as a plug, not a reservoir, where oil would be trapped in talus slopes on the reefs flanks.
Bg.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- EMR
- howmuch oil in 45 sqkm x 70mtr of vugular rock
howmuch oil in 45 sqkm x 70mtr of vugular rock, page-7
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 10 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add EMR (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
$3.85 |
Change
-0.010(0.26%) |
Mkt cap ! $2.526B |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
$3.86 | $3.95 | $3.83 | $4.127M | 1.062M |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
6 | 27760 | $3.85 |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
$3.86 | 9771 | 2 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
4 | 21400 | 3.850 |
2 | 5689 | 3.840 |
2 | 5689 | 3.830 |
1 | 1125 | 3.820 |
1 | 1125 | 3.810 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
3.880 | 1125 | 1 |
3.890 | 1125 | 1 |
3.900 | 34579 | 7 |
3.910 | 22955 | 3 |
3.920 | 5689 | 2 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 10/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
EMR (ASX) Chart |
The Watchlist
I88
INFINI RESOURCES LIMITED
Charles Armstrong, CEO
Charles Armstrong
CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online