it's not about that UT and you know it.
It's about Morrison saying he was backing Palmer for important constitutional reasons, then reversing that position after discovering it was very unpopular in WA.
So his important constitutional reasons suddenly lost their importance, were never important, or he just folded under pressure.
Whichever it is Palmer will not be pleased as he expects debts to be repaid.
- Forums
- Political Debate
- How's this for slimy
How's this for slimy, page-28
- There are more pages in this discussion • 17 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)