I hope someone comes in with something better because at the moment neither of these two options look attractive and I think we are better off staying independent. Particularly regarding the claims that 20% of the profits go to the HSK directors. If this is true then NQM's Target Statement is misleading as they state that we will have a beneficial interest in Pajingo of 60% post takeover, but if the directors take 20% of the profits first then our share of the profits is only 48%.
I have called the NQM shareholder hotline and questioned this and will post the response on here. Has anyone else questioned this claim?
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- hsk app3d
I hope someone comes in with something better because at the...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 5 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add NQM (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
FHE
FRONTIER ENERGY LIMITED
Adam Kiley, CEO
Adam Kiley
CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online