Anyone know what sort of viral reduction rate would be required for governments to pay for or subsidise the treatment?
If I was king of a country I wouldn't be subsidising such a treatment unless it was close to 100% effective.
I really fail to see a big benefit of 30%, 50% or 70% reduction in shredding, particularly if it's assymptomatic shredding.
Anyone know what sort of viral reduction rate would be required...
Add AVR (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$15.30 |
Change
0.150(0.99%) |
Mkt cap ! $294.1M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $15.35 | $15.35 | $15.00 | $92.29K | 6.09K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 50 | $15.20 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $15.30 | 276 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 31/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| AVR (ASX) Chart |