Hunter Biden's "lap top from hell" investigation expands., page-17

In response to your multiple posts about the material contained on various copies of the HDD, here's some COC details and actual facts.

Standard advice that separating the link's spin from fact is easily done by an experienced reader. Emphasis added.

What are your thoughts on these NEW FOLDERS that were created in 2020 on the COPY HDDs, ie after the original was dropped off by Hunter ?

"Desktop Documents", "Biden, Burisma", "Hunter. Burisma Documents".

I do also note your decreasing levels of confidence regarding potential charges.


" Hal Sparks Dismantles WaPo For Hunter Biden Laptop Nonsense

Hal Sparks breaks down the recent farce of a "report" by The Washington Post on the supposed Hunter Biden laptop.

As Sparks discussed during the broadcast, first of all, no one actually has the laptop. They've supposedly got (multiple) copies of what was "purportedly" on the hard drive, but even The Washington Post's own reporting admits that there are huge issues with what their "experts" examined from those contents:

Thousands of emails purportedly from the laptop computer of Hunter Biden, President Joe Biden’s son, are authentic communications that can be verified through cryptographic signatures from Google and other technology companies, say two security experts who examined the data at the request of The Washington Post.

The verifiable emails are a small fraction of 217 gigabytes of data provided to The Post on a portable hard drive by Republican activist Jack Maxey. He said the contents of the portable drive originated from Biden’s MacBook Pro, which Biden reportedly dropped off at a computer repair shop in Wilmington, Del., in April 2019 and never reclaimed.

The vast majority of the data - and most of the nearly 129,000 emails it contained - could not be verified by either of the two security experts who reviewed the data for The Post. Neither found clear evidence of tampering in their examinations, but some of the records that might have helped verify contents were not available for analysis, they said.

Among the reasons for the inconclusive findings was sloppy handling of the data, which damaged some records. The experts found the data had been repeatedly accessed and copied by people other than Biden over nearly three years."

https://crooksandliars.com/2022/04/hal-sparks-dismantles-wapo-hunter-biden