Regions will 'likely' be this and that - likely is not a fact. Electrics won't solve CO2 emissions either - correct. Now we have mugs putting up stupid arguments: - how's this:
Apparently one state has a net zero policy toward vehicular accident deaths by a certain date. Funny that, as cars are ever faster in acceleration, roads often substandard, vehicles are being made with driverless technologies and in a back drop of ever increasing vehicle registrations. Shame there is no net zero policies aimed at BS. If you want net zero vehicle deaths, make sure the vehicles are also void of passengers. As for walkers, beware of any traffic, lest you become a problem on the way to net zero.
As for science, do some research on unintended consequences as a direct result of scientific interventions in order to control everything - particularly when govt gets on board. Net zero policies are simply control measures - whether the weather will behave as man wants it to or whether the weather will show unintended consequences is yet to be known. As yet, the weather is the boss and despite man's efforts to control it, it can whip up a storm anywhere, anytime. Maybe the weather needs to develop net zero policies in response to man's feeble attempts to control it. AIMO
'In recorded history' - and what about all those weather events that in all probability happened prior to 'recorded' history but since no recordings of such, it's a little hard to ascertain severities.
A weather report regarding a current hurricane in the US stated that the hurricane season is a little earlier than usual. Fact is, in the US, hurricane seasons are well known to occur and occurred well before climate alarmisms. Perhaps the Indians in north America have knowledge of such occurrances and their severities well before the arrival of white man. AIMO
