sequestration itself is expensive and so much money has been put...

  1. 35,375 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 495
    sequestration itself is expensive and so much money has been put into something that really isn't a viable option

    Oz has a renewable source of energy that can produce way more than finite natural gas - solar
    It's cheap , you can produce hydrogen from it , ammonia from that
    the Pilbara of WA where all the iron ore is mined has endless sunshine - can use the hydrogen to make steel on site

    this is the future for our country - (I'm not a "green" btw , but a scientist and a realist )


    but the idea of using the CO2 has long interested me - one thought in the back of my mind involved big ponds and algae production , amybe used for animal feed

    Also I'm not in a hurry to get rid of gas as this is our bridging energy source while renewables are being transitioned to .

    One more thought ..... oil and natuaral gas are finite resources ...... and really too vvaluable as chemicals to be wasted as fuels
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.