switching catalyst may seem easy on paper and they would...

switching catalyst may seem easy on paper and they would probably be smart from the beginnen to know they can't just copy the approach.

Andrew set out with a complete different way of thinking, established what kind of catalyst would fit best for the intended purpose and HZR has been tweaking the catalyst, production, process parameters until under control, that is far more valuable as IP than just the patent.

Choosing another pathway, will force you to investigate ideal parameters of input and process: control of catalyst, production and control over a homogeneous endproduct, not just a matter of months, but longer. You can take this from the reports that HZR made available 7 years back or so, at that point results were already excellent, but then you establish a plant, need to fine tune to get back to that. And yet there are people that demand that HZR put the numbers from testing/validating the process on the table. How ignorant can a shareholder be.