and BTW you will note that there is a gulf of difference between those presenting information in good faith and the big pharma guys on here.
One of these core differences seems to be the absolute reticence for these guys to produce any of the so called studies discrediting NCQ + its adjuvants within the parameters commonly ascribing to some success. All you get is reports of studies or hit pieces. You can always put money on a link being provided to a misrepresentative study or worse still some defamatory hit piece attacking some straw man.
Sure, we all know there are studies where people were OD'd, treated on their last legs (on ventilators etc), treated without the full co administrations and on and on. But where are the 'official' big pharma studies within the parameters. It cannot be a accidental oversight. (and yes one can almost expect a 'So what are these parameters' obtuseness to present itself).
Clearly the strategy has been to 'buy time', one is entitled to wonder 'but time for what'..........wait!!!
