In this new data driven computer world so many researchers conduct and publish investigations into a wide variety of subjects from the comfort of their office and with access to a vast knowledge base and if criticized quot, Blind studies, Peer reviews etc
It would appear that there is very little actual true proper testing occurring
The much published and followed discredited report, about how bad HCQ was that the Lancet published which they were forced to back down and cover up is a prime example of bad research and even a lay person if they took the time to read the original report would conclude that it was a fabrication
So many widely published reports if you mine down to the original source come from a single example of poor research, but people appear to want to publish and take the money rather than do their own in depth research so they just copy data
So please if you quote some wonderful report to prove your claim DYOR and look at the raw data not someone else's opinion of the facts
