well just popped by and sure enough the following statement is proven true yet again.............
from Post #: 47482278 "One of these core differences seems to be the absolute reticence for these guys to produce any of the so called studies discrediting NCQ + its adjuvants (such as antibiotics and zinc) within the parameters commonly ascribing to some success. All you get is reports of studies or links to the irrelevant. You can almost put money on a link now being provided to one of the misrepresentative studies............."
so we get a screenshot, but not the link to one such misrepresentive study.........
why?, perhaps because the link would have allowed people to see, unequivocally that the disingenuously presented study made no mention whatsoever of the known adjuvants, rendering it irrelevant.
